Paper detail

The sensitivity of the microstructure and properties to the peak temperature in an ultrafast heat treated low carbon-steel

In this work, we investigate the sensitivity of the microstructure and mechanical properties of an ultrafast heat treated low carbon-steel to the peak temperature. In all studied cases, the steel was heated within the intercritical temperature range (i.e. between the AC1 and AC3 temperatures). Both the peak temperature and soaking time were varied, and their effect on the size, the fraction of individual microstructural constituents and their tensile mechanical response were investigated. It is shown that the increasing peak temperature and soaking time promote austenite formation and recrystallization processes in the ferritic matrix. The highest nanohardness is shown by martensitic grains, while recovered ferrite demonstrated slightly higher nanohardness compared to recrystallized ferrite. The applied heat treatment parameters have strong effect on the nanohardness of martensite, whereas nanohardness of ferrite microconstituents is not sensitive to variation of the peak temperature and soaking time. The non-recrystallized ferrite is harder than its recrystallized counterpart due to the higher dislocation density of the former. Increasing peak temperatures promote strengthening in the material at the expense of its ductility mainly due to increased martensite fraction. The steel demonstrates enhanced strain hardening ability independently of the peak temperature. Analysis of the experimental results showed that the industrial processing window of +- 10 oC may lead to some heterogeneity of the local microstructure in the ultrafast heat treated sheets. However, the latter should not have any negative effect on the overall mechanical behavior of the ultrafast heat treated steel sheets on the macro-scale.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.