Paper detail

The Secrecy Capacity of Compound Gaussian MIMO Wiretap Channels

Strong secrecy capacity of compound wiretap channels is studied. The known lower bounds for the secrecy capacity of compound finite-state memoryless channels under discrete alphabets are extended to arbitrary uncertainty sets and continuous alphabets under the strong secrecy criterion. The conditions under which these bounds are tight are given. Under the saddle-point condition, the compound secrecy capacity is shown to be equal to that of the worst-case channel. Based on this, the compound Gaussian MIMO wiretap channel is studied under the spectral norm constraint and without the degradedness assumption. First, it is assumed that only the eavesdropper channel is unknown, but is known to have a bounded spectral norm (maximum channel gain). The compound secrecy capacity is established in a closed form and the optimal signaling is identified: the compound capacity equals the worst-case channel capacity thus establishing the saddle-point property; the optimal signaling is Gaussian and on the eigenvectors of the legitimate channel and the worst-case eavesdropper is isotropic. The eigenmode power allocation somewhat resembles the standard water-filling but is not identical to it. More general uncertainty sets are considered and the existence of a maximum element is shown to be sufficient for a saddle-point to exist, so that signaling on the worst-case channel achieves the compound capacity of the whole class of channels. The case of rank-constrained eavesdropper is considered and the respective compound secrecy capacity is established. Subsequently, the case of additive uncertainty in the legitimate channel, in addition to the unknown eavesdropper channel, is studied. Its compound secrecy capacity and the optimal signaling are established in a closed-form as well, revealing the same saddle-point property.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.