Paper detail

The second term for two-neighbour bootstrap percolation in two dimensions

In the $r$-neighbour bootstrap process on a graph $G$, vertices are infected (in each time step) if they have at least $r$ already-infected neighbours. Motivated by its close connections to models from statistical physics, such as the Ising model of ferromagnetism, and kinetically constrained spin models of the liquid-glass transition, the most extensively-studied case is the two-neighbour bootstrap process on the two-dimensional grid $[n]^2$. Around 15 years ago, in a major breakthrough, Holroyd determined the sharp threshold for percolation in this model, and his bounds were subsequently sharpened further by Gravner and Holroyd, and by Gravner, Holroyd and Morris. In this paper we strengthen the lower bound of Gravner, Holroyd and Morris by proving that the critical probability $p_c\big( [n]^2,2 \big)$ for percolation in the two-neighbour model on $[n]^2$ satisfies \[p_c\big( [n]^2,2 \big) = \frac{π^2}{18\log n} - \frac{Θ(1)}{(\log n)^{3/2}}\,.\] The proof of this result requires a very precise understanding of the typical growth of a critical droplet, and involves a number of technical innovations. We expect these to have other applications, for example, to the study of more general two-dimensional cellular automata, and to the $r$-neighbour process in higher dimensions.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.