Paper detail

The second Hardy-Littlewood conjecture is true

The second Hardy-Littlewood conjecture, that $π(x)+π(y) \geq π(x+y)$ for integers $x$ and $y$ with $\min\{x,y\}\geq 2$, was formulated in 1923. It continues to attract attention to this day, almost 100 years later. In 1975 Udrescu proved that this conjecture holds for $(x,y)$ sufficiently large, but without an explicit effective bound on the region of validity. We shall revisit Udrescu's result, modifying it to obtain explicit effective bounds, ultimately proving that the second Hardy-Littlewood conjecture is in fact unconditionally true. Furthermore we note that constraints on the prime counting function imply, (and are implied by), constraints on the location of the primes, and re-cast Segal's 1962 equivalent reformulation of the second Hardy-Littlewood conjecture in the more symmetric (and perhaps clearer) form that for integers $i$ and $j$ with $\min\{i,j\} \geq 2$ one has $p_{i+j-1} \geq p_i + p_j -1$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.