Paper detail

The Search for Failed Supernovae with The Large Binocular Telescope: First Candidates

We are monitoring 27 galaxies within 10 Mpc using the Large Binocular Telescope to search for failed supernovae (SNe), massive stars that collapse to form a black hole without a SN explosion. We present the results from the first 4 years of survey data, during which these galaxies were observed to produce 3 successful core-collapse SNe. We search for stars that have "vanished" over the course of our survey, by examining all stars showing a decrease in luminosity of $ΔνL_ν \ge 10^4L_{\odot}$ from the first to the last observation. We also search for the low luminosity, long duration transients predicted by \citet{lovegrove2013} for failed explosions of red supergiants. After analyzing the first 4 years of data in this first direct search for failed SNe, we are left with one candidate requiring further study. This candidate has an estimated mass of 18-25$M_{\odot}$, a mass range likely associated with failed SNe and, if real, implies that failed SN represent a median fraction of $f \simeq 0.30$ of core-collapses, with symmetric 90% confidence limits of $0.07 \le f \le 0.62$. If follow up data eliminate this candidate, we find an upper limit on the fraction of core collapses leading to a failed SN of $f<0.40$ at 90% confidence. As the duration of the survey continues to increase, it will begin to constrain the $f \simeq$ 10-30% failure rates needed to explain the deficit of massive SN progenitors and the observed black hole mass function.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.