Paper detail

The SDSS/XMM-Newton Quasar Survey: Correlation between X-ray spectral slope and Eddington ratio

We present a correlation between the 2-10 keV spectral slope Gamma and the Eddington ratio L/L_{EDD} in a sample of ~400 Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars with available hard X-ray spectra from XMM-Newton serendipitous observations. We find that the Gamma-L/L_{EDD} correlation is strongest in objects with black hole (BH) masses determined from the Hbeta line, and weaker (but still present) for those based on Mg II. An empirical non-linear correction of the Mg II-based masses, obtained by comparing the mass estimates in SDSS quasars having both Hbeta and Mg II measurements, significantly increases the strength of the correlation. No correlation is found among objects with BH masses derived from C IV, confirming that this line is not a reliable indicator of the BH mass. No significant correlation is found with the bolometric luminosity, while a Gamma-M_BH relation is present, though with a lower statistical significance than between Gamma and L/L_{EDD}. Our results imply a physical link between the accretion efficiency in the (cold) accretion disc of AGNs and the physical status of the (hot) corona responsible for the X-ray emission.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.