Paper detail

The SDSS-HET Survey of Kepler Eclipsing Binaries. Description of the Survey and First Results

The Kepler mission has provided a treasure trove of eclipsing binaries (EBs), observed at extremely high photometric precision, nearly continuously for several years. We are carrying out a survey of ~100 of these EBs to derive dynamical masses and radii with precisions of 3% or better. We use multiplexed near-infrared H band spectroscopy from the SDSS-III and -IV APOGEE instrument and optical spectroscopy from the HET High-Resolution Spectrograph to derive double-lined spectroscopic orbits and dynamical mass-ratios for the EB sample. This information is combined with Kepler photometry to derive orbital inclination, dynamical masses of the components, radii and temperatures. These measurements are directly applicable for benchmarking stellar models that are integrating the next generation of improvements, such as the magnetic suppression of convection efficiency, updated opacity tables, and fine-tuned equations of state. We selected our EB sample to include systems with low-mass ($M \lt 0.8 \; M_{\odot}$) primary or secondary components, many expected to populate the relatively sparse parameter space below $0.5 \; M_{\odot}$. In this paper, we describe our EB sample and the analysis techniques we are utilizing, and present masses and radii for two systems that inhabit particularly underpopulated regions of mass-radius-period space: KIC 2445134 and KIC 3003991. Our analysis of KIC 2445134 ($q=0.411 \pm 0.001$) yields masses and radii of $M_A = 1.29 \pm 0.03 \; M_{\odot}$, $M_B = 0.53 \pm 0.01 \; M_{\odot}$, $R_A = 1.42 \pm 0.01 \; R_{\odot}$, $R_B = 0.510 \pm 0.004 \; R_{\odot}$, and a temperature ratio of $T_B/T_A = 0.635 \pm 0.001$; our analysis of KIC 3003991 ($q=0.298 \pm 0.006$) yields $M_A = 0.74 \pm \; 0.04 M_{\odot}$, $M_B = 0.222 \pm \; 0.007 M_{\odot}$, $R_A = 0.84 \pm 0.01 \; R_{\odot}$, $R_B = 0.250 \pm 0.004 \; R_{\odot}$, and a temperature ratio of $T_B/T_A= 0.662 \pm 0.001$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.