Paper detail

The scaling relations and star formation laws of ministarburst complexes

The scaling relations and the star formation laws for molecular cloud complexes in the Milky Way is investigated. We compare their masses $M_{\rm gas}$, mass surface densities $Σ_{M_{\rm gas}}$, radii $R$, velocity dispersions $σ$, star formation rates $SFR$, and SFR densities $Σ_{\rm SFR}$ with those of structures ranging from cores, clumps, Giant Molecular Clouds (GMCs), to Molecular Cloud Complexes (MCCs), and to Galaxies, spanning 8 orders of magnitudes in size and 13 orders of magnitudes in mass. MCC are mostly large ($R>50$ pc), massive ($\sim 10^{6}$\,\msun) gravitationally unbound cloud structures. This results in the following universal relations: $σ\sim R^{0.5}$, $M_{\rm gas}\sim R^{2}$, $Σ_{\rm SFR}\sim Σ_{M_{\rm gas}}^{1.5}$, ${SFR}\sim {M_{\rm gas}}^{0.9}$, and ${SFR}\sim σ^{2.7}$. Variations in the slopes and the coefficients of these relations are found at individual scales signifying different physics acting at different scales. Additionally, there are breaks at the MCC scale in the $σ-R$ relation and between the starburst and the normal star-forming objects in the $SFR-M_{\rm gas}$ and $Σ_{\rm SFR}$-$Σ_{\rm M_{\rm gas}}$ relations. We propose to use the Schmidt-Kennicutt diagram to distinguish the starburst from the normal star-forming structures by applying a $Σ_{M_{\rm gas}}$ threshold of $\sim100$\,\msun pc$^{-2}$ and a $Σ_{\rm SFR}$ threshold of 1\,\msun yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$. Mini-starburst complexes have enhanced $Σ_{\rm SFR}$ ($>$1\,\msun yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$), probably caused by dynamic events such as radiation pressure, colliding flows, or spiral arm gravitational instability. Because of the dynamical evolution, gravitational boundedness does not play a significant role in characterizing the star formation activity of MCCs, especially the mini-starburst complexes.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.