Paper detail

The Scalar Hexaquark $uuddss$: a Candidate to Dark Matter?

It is conventionally argued that Dark Matter (DM) has a non-baryonic nature, but if we assume that DM was frozen out before primordial nucleosynthesis and could not significantly impact primordial abundances this argument may be evaded. Then a hypothetical $SU(3)$ flavor-singlet, highly symmetric, deeply bound neutral scalar hexaquark $\mathrm{S}=uuddss$, which due to its features has escaped from experimental detection so far, may be considered as a candidate for a baryonic DM. In the present work we calculate the mass and coupling constant of the scalar six-quark particle $\mathrm{S}$ by means of the QCD sum rule method. Our predictions for its mass are $ m_{S}=1180_{-26}^{+40}~\mathrm{MeV}$ ($m_s=95~\mathrm{MeV}$) and $ \widetilde {m}_{S}=1239_{-28}^{+42}~\mathrm{MeV}$ ($m_s=128~\mathrm{MeV}$). Although these values of mass would produce thermally the cosmological DM abundance, existence of this state may contradict to stability of the oxygen nuclei, which requires further thorough analysis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.