Paper detail

The SAURON project XVI: On the Sources of Ionisation for the Gas in Elliptical and Lenticular Galaxies

Following our study on the incidence, morphology and kinematics of the ionised gas in early-type galaxies we now address the question of what is powering the observed nebular emission. To constrain the likely sources of gas excitation, we resort to a variety of ancillary data, draw from complementary information on the gas kinematics, stellar populations and galactic potential from the SAURON data, and use the SAURON-specific diagnostic diagram juxtaposing the [OIII]/Hb and [NI]/Hb line ratios. We find a tight correlation between the stellar surface brightness and the flux of the Hb recombination line across our sample, which points to a diffuse and old stellar source as the main contributor of ionising photons in early-type galaxies, with post-asymptotic giant branch (pAGB) stars being still the best candidate based on ionising-balance arguments. Other ionising sources such as a central AGN, OB-stars, shocks or the interaction between the hot and warm phases of the interestellar medium are found to play only a limited or localised role in powering the diffuse nebular emission observed in our sample galaxies. These results lead us to investigate the relative importance of stellar and AGN photoionisation in explaining the ionised-gas emission observed in early-type galaxies by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). By simulating how our sample galaxies would appear if placed at further distance and targeted by the SDSS, we conclude that only in very few, if any, of the SDSS early-type galaxies that display modest values for the equivalent width of the [OIII] line (less than ~2.4Å) and LINER-like [OIII]/Hb values, the nebular emission is truly powered by an AGN.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access19 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.