Paper detail

The S-metric, the Beichl-Cloteaux approximation, and preferential attachment

The S-metric has grown popular in network studies, as a measure of ``scale-freeness'' restricted to the collection G(D) of connected graphs with a common degree sequence D=(d_1,\ldots,d_n). The calculation of S depends on the maximum possible degree assortativity r among graphs in G(D). The original method involves a heuristic construction of a maximally assortative graph g*. The approximation by Beichl and Cloteaux involves constructing a possibly disconnected graph g' with r(g') >= r(g*) and requires O(n^2) tests for the graphicality of a degree sequence. The present paper uses the Tripathi-Vijay test to streamline this approximation, and thereby to investigate two collections of graphs: Barabasi-Albert trees and coauthorship graphs of mathematical sciences researchers. Long-term trends in the coauthorship graphs are discussed, and contextualized by insights derived from the BA trees. It is known that greater degree-based preferential attachment produces greater variance in degree sequences, and these trees exhibited assortativities restricted to a narrow band. In contrast, variance in degree rose over time in the coauthorship graphs in spite of weakening degree-based preferential attachment. These observations and their implications are discussed and avenues of future work are suggested.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.