Paper detail

The Rudin-Kisler ordering of P-points under $\mathfrak{b} = \mathfrak{c}$

M. E. Rudin proved under CH that for each P-point there exists another P-point strictly RK-greater (M. E. Rudin, Partial orders on the types of $β\mathbb{N}$ , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 155 (1971), 353-362). Assuming $\mathfrak{p}=\mathfrak{c}$ A. Blass showed the same, and proved that each RK-increasing $ω$-sequence of P-points is upper bounded by a P-point, and that there is an order embedding of the real line into the class of P-points with respect to the RK-(pre)ordering (A. Blass, Rudin - Keisler ordering on P-points, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 179 (1973), 145-166). In the present paper the results cited above are proved under a (weaker) assumption $\mathfrak{b}=\mathfrak{c}$. A. Blass also asked in (A. Blass, Rudin - Keisler ordering on P-points, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 179 (1973), 145-166) what ordinals can be embedded in the set of P-points and pointed out, that such an ordinal may not be greater then $\mathfrak{c}^+$. In the present paper the question is answered showing (under $\mathfrak{b} = \mathfrak{c}$) that there is an order embedding of $\mathfrak{c}^+$ into P-points.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.