The Round Complexity of Small Set Intersection

The set disjointness problem is one of the most fundamental and well-studied problems in communication complexity. In this problem Alice and Bob hold sets $S, T \subseteq [n]$, respectively, and the goal is to decide if $S \cap T = \emptyset$. Reductions from set disjointness are a canonical way of proving lower bounds in data stream algorithms, data structures, and distributed computation. In these applications, often the set sizes $|S|$ and $|T|$ are bounded by a value $k$ which is much smaller than $n$. This is referred to as small set disjointness. A major restriction in the above applications is the number of rounds that the protocol can make, which, e.g., translates to the number of passes in streaming applications. A fundamental question is thus in understanding the round complexity of the small set disjointness problem. For an essentially equivalent problem, called OR-Equality, Brody et. al showed that with $r$ rounds of communication, the randomized communication complexity is $Ω(k \ilog^r k)$, where$\ilog^r k$ denotes the $r$-th iterated logarithm function. Unfortunately their result requires the error probability of the protocol to be $1/k^{Θ(1)}$. Since naïve amplification of the success probability of a protocol from constant to $1-1/k^{Θ(1)}$ blows up the communication by a $Θ(\log k)$ factor, this destroys their improvements over the well-known lower bound of $Ω(k)$ which holds for any number of rounds. They pose it as an open question to achieve the same $Ω(k \ilog^r k)$ lower bound for protocols with constant error probability. We answer this open question by showing that the $r$-round randomized communication complexity of ${\sf OREQ}_{n,k}$, and thus also of small set disjointness, with {\it constant error probability} is $Ω(k \ilog^r k)$, asymptotically matching known upper bounds for ${\sf OREQ}_{n,k}$ and small set disjointness.

No reviews yet.

No comments yet.