Paper detail

The Roles of Mass and Environment in the Quenching of Galaxies. II

We take advantage of an analytic model of galaxy formation coupled to the merger tree of an N-body simulation to study the roles of environment and stellar mass in the quenching of galaxies. The model has been originally set in order to provide the observed evolution of the stellar mass function as well as reasonable predictions of the star formation rate-stellar mass relation, from high redshift to the present time. We analyse the stellar mass and environmental quenching efficiencies and their dependence on stellar mass, halo mass (taken as a proxy for the environment) and redshift. Our analysis shows that the two quenching efficiencies are redshift, stellar and halo mass dependent, and that the halo mass is also a good proxy for the environment. The environmental quenching increases with decreasing redshift and is inefficient below $\log M_* \sim 9.5$, reaches the maximum value at $\log M_* \sim 10.5$, and decreases again, becoming poorly efficient at very high stellar mass ($\log M_* \gtrsim 11.5$). Central and satellites galaxies are mass quenched differently: for the former, the quenching efficiency depends very weakly on redshift, but strongly on stellar mass; for the latter, it strongly depends on both stellar mass and redshift in the range $10\lesssim \log M_* \lesssim 11$. According to the most recent observational results, we find that the two quenching efficiencies are not separable: intermediate mass galaxies are environmental quenched faster, as well as intermediate/massive galaxies in more massive haloes. At stellar masses lower than $\log M_* \lesssim 9.5$ both quenching mechanisms become inefficient, independently of the redshift.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.