Paper detail

The role of volatiles in reactive melt transport in the asthenosphere

Experimental studies of mantle petrology find that small concentrations of water and carbon dioxide have a large effect on the solidus temperature and distribution of melting in the upper mantle. However, it has remained unclear what effect small fractions of deep, volatile-rich melts have on melt transport and reactive melting in the shallow asthenosphere. Here we present theory and computations indicating that low-degree, reactive, volatile-rich melts cause channelisation of magmatic flow at depths approximately corresponding to the anhydrous solidus temperature. These results are obtained with a novel method to simulate the thermochemical evolution of the upper mantle in the presence of volatiles. The method uses a thermodynamically consistent framework for reactive, disequilibrium, multi-component melting. It is coupled with a system of equations representing conservation of mass, momentum, and energy for a partially molten grain aggregate. Application of this method in two-phase, three-component upwelling-column models demonstrates that it reproduces leading-order features of hydrated and carbonated peridotite melting; in particular, it captures the production of low-degree, volatile-rich melt at depths far below the volatile-free solidus. The models predict that segregation of volatile-rich, deep melts promotes a reactive channeling instability that creates fast and chemically isolated pathways of melt extraction. Reactive channeling occurs where volatile-rich melts flux the base of the silicate melting region, enhancing dissolution of fusible components from the ambient mantle. We find this effect to be similarly expressed for models of both hydrated and carbonated mantle melting. These findings indicate that despite their small concentrations, water and carbon dioxide have an important control on the extent and style of magma genesis, as well as on the dynamics of melt transport.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.