Paper detail

The role of the supermassive black hole spin in the estimation of the EMRI event rate

A common result to all EMRI investigations on rates is that the possibility that a compact object merges with the MBH after only one intense burst of GWs is much more likely than a slow adiabatic inspiral, an EMRI. The later is referred to as a "plunge" because the compact object dives into the MBH. The event rates for plunges are orders of magnitude larger than slow inspirals. On the other hand, nature MBH's are most likely Kerr and the magnitude of the spin has been sized up to be high. We calculate the number of periapsis passages that a compact object set on to an extremely radial orbit goes through before being actually swallowed by the Kerr MBH and we then translate it into an event rate for a LISA-like observatory, such as the proposed ESA mission eLISA/NGO. We prove that a "plunging" compact object is conceptually indistinguishable from an adiabatic, slow inspiral; plunges spend on average up to hundred of thousands of cycles in the bandwidth of the detector for a two years mission. This has an important impact on the event rate, enhancing in some cases significantly, depending on the spin of the MBH and the inclination. Moreover, it has been recently proved that the production of low-eccentricity EMRIs is severely blocked by the presence of a blockade in the rate at which orbital angular momenta change takes place. This is the result of relativistic precession on to the stellar potential torques and hence affects EMRIs originating via resonant relaxation at distances of about $\sim 10^{-2}$ pc from the MBH. Since high-eccentricity EMRIs are a result of two-body relaxation, they are not affected by this phenomenon. Therefore we predict that eLISA EMRI event rates will be dominated by high-eccentricity binaries, as we present here.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.