Paper detail

The role of the central limit theorem in discovering sharp rates of convergence to equilibrium for the solution of the Kac equation

In Dolera, Gabetta and Regazzini [Ann. Appl. Probab. 19 (2009) 186-201] it is proved that the total variation distance between the solution $f(\cdot,t)$ of Kac's equation and the Gaussian density $(0,σ^2)$ has an upper bound which goes to zero with an exponential rate equal to -1/4 as $t\to+\infty$. In the present paper, we determine a lower bound which decreases exponentially to zero with this same rate, provided that a suitable symmetrized form of $f_0$ has nonzero fourth cumulant $κ_4$. Moreover, we show that upper bounds like $\bar{C}_δe^{-({1/4})t}ρ_δ(t)$ are valid for some $ρ_δ$ vanishing at infinity when $\int_{\mathbb{R}}|v|^{4+δ}f_0(v)\,dv<+\infty$ for some $δ$ in $[0,2[$ and $κ_4=0$. Generalizations of this statement are presented, together with some remarks about non-Gaussian initial conditions which yield the insuperable barrier of -1 for the rate of convergence.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.