Paper detail

The role of super-asymptotic giant branch ejecta in the abundance patterns of multiple populations in globular clusters

In order to account for the chemical composition of a stellar second generation (SG), Globular Clusters (GCs) evolution models based on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) scenario so far included only the yields available for the massive AGB stars, while the possible role of super-AGB ejecta was either extrapolated or not considered. In this work, we explore the role of super-AGB ejecta using yields recently calculated by Ventura and D'Antona. Models of clusters showing extended Na-O anticorrelations, like NGC 2808, indicate that a SG formation history similar to that outlined in our previous work is required: formation of an Extreme population with very large helium content from the pure ejecta of super-AGB stars, followed by formation of an Intermediate population by dilution of stellar ejecta with pristine gas. The very O-poor Na-rich Extreme stars can be accounted for once deep-mixing is assumed in SG giants forming in a gas with helium abundance Y> 0.34, which significantly reduces the atmospheric oxygen content, while preserving the sodium abundance. On the other hand, for clusters showing a mild O-Na anticorrelation, like M 4, the use of the new yields broadens the range of SG formation routes leading to abundance patterns consistent with observations. It is shown that models in which SG stars form only from super-AGB ejecta promptly diluted with pristine gas can reproduce the observations. We discuss the variety of small helium variations occurring in this model and its relevance for the horizontal branch morphology. In some of these models the duration of the SG formation episode can be as short as \sim10 Myr; the formation time of the SG is thus compatible with the survival of a cooling flow in the GC, previous to the explosion of the SG core collapse supernovae. We also explore models with formation of multiple populations in individual bursts, each lasting no longer than \sim10 Myr.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.