Paper detail

The role of stochastic and smooth processes in regulating galaxy quenching

Galaxies can be classified as passive ellipticals or star-forming discs. Ellipticals dominate at the high end of the mass range, and therefore there must be a mechanism responsible for the quenching of star-forming galaxies. This could either be due to the secular processes linked to the mass and star formation of galaxies or to external processes linked to the surrounding environment. In this paper, we analytically model the processes that govern galaxy evolution and quantify their contribution. We have specifically studied the effects of mass quenching, gas stripping, and mergers on galaxy quenching. To achieve this, we first assumed a set of differential equations that describe the processes that shape galaxy evolution. We then modelled the parameters of these equations by maximising likelihood. These equations describe the evolution of galaxies individually, but the parameters of the equations are constrained by matching the extrapolated intermediate-redshift galaxies with the low-redshift galaxy population. In this study, we modelled the processes that change star formation and stellar mass in massive galaxies from the GAMA survey between z~0.4 and the present. We identified and quantified the contributions from mass quenching, gas stripping, and mergers to galaxy quenching. The quenching timescale is on average 1.2 Gyr and a closer look reveals support for the slow-then-rapid quenching scenario. The major merging rate of galaxies is about once per 10~Gyr, while the rate of ram pressure stripping is significantly higher. In galaxies with decreasing star formation, we show that star formation is lost to fast quenching mechanisms such as ram pressure stripping and is countered by mergers, at a rate of about 41% Gyr$^{-1}$ and to mass quenching 49% Gyr$^{-1}$. (abridged)

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.