Paper detail

The role of stellar mass and environment for cluster blue fraction, AGN fraction and star-formation indicators from a targeted analysis of Abell 1691

We present an analysis of the galaxy population of the intermediate X-ray luminosity galaxy cluster, Abell 1691, from SDSS and Galaxy Zoo data to elucidate the relationships between environment and galaxy stellar mass for a variety of observationally important cluster populations that include the Butcher-Oemler blue fraction, the active galactic nucleus (AGN) fraction and other spectroscopic classifications of galaxies. From 342 cluster members, we determine a cluster recession velocity of 21257+/-54 km/s and velocity dispersion of 1009^+40_-36 km/s and show that although the cluster is fed by multiple filaments of galaxies it does not possess significant sub-structure in its core. We identify the AGN population of the cluster from a BPT diagram and show that there is a mild increase in the AGN fraction with radius from the cluster centre that appears mainly driven by high mass galaxies (log(stellar mass)>10.8). Although the cluster blue fraction follows the same radial trend, it is caused primarily by lower mass galaxies (log(stellar mass)<10.8). Significantly, the galaxies that have undergone recent star-bursts or are presently star-bursting but dust-shrouded (spectroscopic e(a) class galaxies) are also nearly exclusively driven by low mass galaxies. We therefore suggest that the Butcher-Oemler effect may be a mass-dependant effect. We also examine red and passive spiral galaxies and show that the majority are massive galaxies, much like the rest of the red and spectroscopically passive cluster population. We further demonstrate that the velocity dispersion profiles of low and high mass cluster galaxies are different. Taken together, we infer that the duty cycle of high and low mass cluster galaxies are markedly different, with a significant departure in star formation and specific star formation rates observed beyond r_200 and we discuss these findings.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.