Paper detail

The Role of Stellar Feedback in the Chemical Evolution of a Low Mass Dwarf Galaxy

We investigate how each aspect of a multi-channel stellar feedback model drives the chemodynamical evolution of a low-mass, isolated dwarf galaxy using a suite of high-resolution simulations. Our model follows individual star particles sampled randomly from an adopted initial mass function, considering independently feedback from: supernovae; stellar radiation causing photoelectric heating of dust grains, ionization and associated heating, Lyman-Werner (LW) dissociation of H$_2$, and radiation pressure; and winds from massive main sequence (neglecting their energy input) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. Radiative transfer is done by ray tracing. We consider the effects each of these processes have on regulating the star formation rate, global properties, multi-phase interstellar medium (ISM), and driving of galactic winds. We follow individual metal species from distinct nucleosynthetic enrichment channels (AGB winds, massive star stellar winds, core collapse and Type Ia supernovae) and pay particular attention to how these feedback processes regulate metal mixing in the ISM, the metal content of outflows, and the stellar abundance patterns in our galaxy. We find that---for a low-metallicity, low-mass dwarf galaxy ---stellar radiation, particularly ionizing radiation and LW radiation, are important sources of stellar feedback whose effects dominate over photoelectric heating and HI radiation pressure. However, feedback is coupled non-linearly, and the inclusion or exclusion of each process produces non-negligible effects. We find strong variations with: the star formation history; the ejection fractions of metals, mass, and energy; and the distribution of elements from different nucleosynthetic sources in both the gas and stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.