Paper detail

The role of SE(d)-reduction for swimming in Stokes and Navier-Stokes fluids

Steady swimming appears both periodic and stable. These characteristics are the very definition of limit cycles, and so we ask "Can we view swimming as a limit cycle?" In this paper we will not be able to answer this question in full. However, we shall find that reduction by SE(d)-symmetry brings us closer. Upon performing reduction by symmetry, we will find a stable fixed point which corresponds to a motionless body in stagnant water. We will then speculate on the existence of periodic orbits which are "approximately" limit cycles in the reduced system. When we lift these periodic orbits from the reduced phase space, we obtain dynamically robust relatively periodic orbits wherein each period is related to the previous by an SE(d)-phase. Clearly, an SE(d) phase consisting of nonzero translation and identity rotation means directional swimming, while non-trivial rotations correspond to turning with a constant turning radius.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.