Paper detail

The role of rationality in integer-programming relaxations

For a finite set $X \subset \mathbb{Z}^d$ that can be represented as $X = Q \cap \mathbb{Z}^d$ for some polyhedron $Q$, we call $Q$ a relaxation of $X$ and define the relaxation complexity $rc(X)$ of $X$ as the least number of facets among all possible relaxations $Q$ of $X$. The rational relaxation complexity $rc_\mathbb{Q}(X)$ restricts the definition of $rc(X)$ to rational polyhedra $Q$. In this article, we focus on $X = Δ_d$, the vertex set of the standard simplex, which consists of the null vector and the standard unit vectors in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We show that $rc(Δ_d) \leq d$ for every $d \geq 5$. That is, since $rc_{\mathbb{Q}}(Δ_d)=d+1$, irrationality can reduce the minimal size of relaxations. This answers an open question posed by Kaibel and Weltge (Lower bounds on the size of integer programs without additional variables, Mathematical Programming, 154(1):407-425, 2015). Moreover, we prove the asymptotic statement $rc(Δ_d) \in O(\frac{d}{\sqrt{\log(d)}})$, which shows that the ratio $rc(Δ_d)/rc_{\mathbb{Q}}(Δ_d)$ goes to $0$, as $d\to \infty$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.