Paper detail

The Role of Intracellular Interactions in the Collective Polarization of Tissues and its Interplay with Cellular Geometry

Planar cell polarity (PCP), the coherent in-plane polarization of a tissue on multicellular length scales, provides directional information that guides a multitude of developmental processes at cellular and tissue levels. While it is manifest that cells utilize both intracellular and intercellular mechanisms, how the two produce the collective polarization remains an active area of investigation. We study the role of intracellular interactions in the large-scale spatial coherence of cell polarities, and scrutinize the role of intracellular interactions in the emergence of tissue-wide polarization. We demonstrate that nonlocal cytoplasmic interactions are necessary and sufficient for the robust long-range polarization, and are essential to the faithful detection of weak directional signals. In the presence of nonlocal interactions, signatures of geometrical information in tissue polarity become manifest. We investigate the deleterious effects of geometric disorder, and determine conditions on the cytoplasmic interactions that guarantee the stability of polarization. These conditions get progressively more stringent upon increasing the geometric disorder. Another situation where the role of geometrical information might be evident is elongated tissues. Strikingly, our model recapitulates an observed influence of tissue elongation on the orientation of polarity. Eventually, we introduce three classes of mutants: lack of membrane proteins, cytoplasmic proteins, and local geometrical irregularities. We adopt core-PCP as a model pathway, and interpret the model parameters accordingly, through comparing the in silico and in vivo phenotypes. This comparison helps us shed light on the roles of the cytoplasmic proteins in cell-cell communication, and make predictions regarding the cooperation of cytoplasmic and membrane proteins in long-range polarization.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.