Paper detail

The role of dust destruction and dust growth in the evolution of the interstellar medium

We use Milky Way-like chemodynamical simulations with a new treatment for dust destruction and growth to investigate how these two processes affect the properties of the interstellar medium in galaxies. We focus on the role of two specific parameters: f_des (a new parameter that determines the fraction of dust destroyed in a single gas particle surrounding supernova) and C_s (the probability that a metal atom or ion sticks to the dust grain after colliding, i.e., the sticking coefficient) in regulating the amount and distribution of dust, cold gas and metals in galaxies. We find that simulated galaxies with low f_des and/or high C_s values produce not only more dust, but they also have a shallower correlation between dust surface density and total gas surface density, and a steeper correlation between dust-to-gas ratio and metallicity. Only for values of f_des between 0.01 and 0.02, and of C_s between 0.5 and 1 our simulations produce an average slope of the dust-to-gas ratio versus metallicity relation consistent with observations. f_des values correspond to a range of a total fraction of dust destroyed by a single supernova between 0.42 and 0.44. Lastly, we compare predictions of several simulations (with different star formation recipes, gas fractions, central metallicities, and metallicity gradients) to the spatially resolved M101 galaxy, and conclude that metallicity is the primary driver of the spatial distribution of dust, while dust-to-gas ratio controls the cold gas distribution, as it regulates the atomic-to-molecular hydrogen conversion rate.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.