Paper detail

The role of dilation and confining stresses in shear thickening of dense suspensions

Many densely packed suspensions and colloids exhibit a behavior known as Discontinuous Shear Thickening in which the shear stress jumps dramatically and reversibly as the shear rate is increased. We performed rheometry and video microscopy measurements on a variety of suspensions to determine the mechanism for this behavior. Shear profiles and normal stress measurements indicate that, in the shear thickening regime, stresses are transmitted through frictional rather than viscous interactions, and come to the surprising conclusion that the local constitutive relation between stress and shear rate is not necessarily shear thickening. If the suspended particles are heavy enough to settle we find the onset stress of shear thickening tau_min corresponds to a hydrostatic pressure from the weight of the particle packing where neighboring particles begin to shear relative to each other. Above tau_min, dilation is seen to cause particles to penetrate the liquid-air interface of the sheared sample. The upper stress boundary tau_max of the shear thickening regime is shown to roughly match the ratio of surface tension divided by a radius of curvature on the order of the particle size. These results suggest a new model in which the increased dissipation in the shear thickening regime comes from frictional stresses that emerge as dilation is frustrated by a confining stress from surface tension at the liquid-air interface. When instead the suspensions are confined by solid walls and have no liquid-air interface, we find tau_max is set by the stiffness of the most compliant boundary which frustrates dilation. This rheology can be described by a non-local constitutive relation in which the local relation between stress and shear rate is shear thinning, but where the stress increase comes from a normal stress term which depends on the global dilation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.