Paper detail

The role of Coherent Structures and Inhomogeneity in Near-Field Inter-Scale Turbulent Energy Transfers

We use DNS to study inter-scale and inter-space energy exchanges in the near-field of a turbulent wake of a square prism in terms of the KHMH equation written for a triple decomposition of the velocity field accounting for the quasi-periodic vortex shedding. Orientation-averaged terms of the KHMH are computed on the plane of the mean flow and on the geometric centreline. We consider locations between $2$ and $8$ times the width $d$ of the prism. The mean flow produces kinetic energy which feeds the vortex shedding coherent structures. In turn, these structures transfer energy to the stochastic fluctuations over all length-scales $r$ from the Taylor length $λ$ to $d$ and dominate spatial turbulent transport of two-point stochastic turbulent fluctuations. The orientation-averaged non-linear inter-scale transfer rate $Π^{a}$ which was found to be approximately independent of $r$ by Alves Portela et. al. (2017) in the range $λ\le r \le 0.3d$ at a distance $x_{1}=2d$ from the square prism requires an inter-scale transfer contribution of coherent structures for this approximate constancy. However, the near-constancy of $Π^a$ at $x_1=8d$ which was also found by Alves Portela et. al. (2017) is mostly due to stochastic fluctuations. Even so, the proximity of $-Π^a$ to the turbulence dissipation rate $\varepsilon$ in the range $λ\le r\le d$ at $x_1=8d$ requires contributions of the coherent structures. Spatial inhomogeneity also makes a direct and distinct contribution to $Π^a$, and the constancy of $-Π^a/\varepsilon$ close to 1 would not have been possible without it either in this near-field flow. Finally, the pressure-velocity term is also an important contributor to the KHMH, particularly at scales r larger than about $0.4d$, and appears to correlate with the purely stochastic non-linear inter-scale transfer rate when the orientation average is lifted.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.