Paper detail

The role of black hole mass in quasar radio activity

We use a homogeneous sample of about 300, 0.3 <~ z <~ 3, radio-loud quasars drawn from the FIRST and 2dF QSO surveys to investigate a possible dependence of radio activity on black-hole mass. By analyzing composite spectra for the populations of radio-quiet and radio-loud QSOs -- chosen to have the same redshift and luminosity distribution -- we find with high statistical significance that radio-loud quasars are on average associated with black holes of masses ~10^{8.6} M_sun, about twice as large as those measured for radio-quiet quasars (~10^{8.3} M_sun). We also find a clear dependence of black hole mass on optical luminosity of the form log (M_BH/M_sun)_{RL}= 8.57(\pm 0.06) - 0.27(\pm 0.06) (M_B + 24.5) and log (M_BH/M_sun)_{RQ}= 8.43(\pm 0.05) -0.32(\pm 0.06) (M_B + 24.5), respectively for the case of radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars. It is intriguing to note that these two trends run roughly parallel to each other, implying that radio-loud quasars are associated to black holes more massive than those producing the radio-quiet case at all sampled luminosities. On the other hand, in the case of radio-loud quasars, we find evidence for only a weak (if any) dependence of the black hole mass on radio power. The above findings seem to support the belief that there exists -- at a given optical luminosity -- a threshold black hole mass associated with the onset of significant radio activity such as that of radio-loud QSOs; however, once the activity is triggered, there appears to be very little connection between black hole mass and level of radio output.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.