Paper detail

The Robustness and the Doubly-Preferential Attachment Simulation of the Consensus Connectome Dynamics of the Human Brain

The increasing quantity and quality of the publicly available human cerebral diffusion MRI data make possible the study of the brain as it was unimaginable before. The Consensus Connectome Dynamics (CCD) is a remarkable phenomenon that was discovered by continuously decreasing the minimum confidence-parameter at the graphical interface of the Budapest Reference Connectome Server (\url{http://connectome.pitgroup.org}). The Budapest Reference Connectome Server depicts the cerebral connections of $n=418$ subjects with a frequency-parameter $k$: For any $k=1,2,...,n$ one can view the graph of the edges that are present in at least $k$ connectomes. If parameter $k$ is decreased one-by-one from $k=n$ through $k=1$ then more and more edges appear in the graph, since the inclusion condition is relaxed. The surprising observation is that the appearance of the edges is far from random: it resembles a growing, complex structure, like a tree or a shrub (visualized on \url{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxlyudPaVUE}). Here we examine the robustness of the CCD phenomenon, and we show that it is almost independent of the particular choice of the set of underlying individual connectomes, yielding the CCD phenomenon. This result shows that the CCD phenomenon is very likely a biological property of the human brain and not just a property of the data sets examined. We also present a simulation that well-describes the growth of the CCD structure: in our random graph model a doubly-preferential attachment distribution is found to mimic the CCD: a new edge appear with a probability proportional to the sum of the degrees of the endpoints of the new edge.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.