Paper detail

The Rise of the Remarkable Type IIn Supernova SN 2009ip

Recent observations by Mauerhan et al. have shown the unprecedented transition of the previously identified luminous blue variable (and supernova impostor) SN 2009ip to a real Type IIn supernova (SN) explosion. We present high-cadence optical imaging of SN 2009ip obtained between 2012 UT Sep. 23.6 and Oct. 9.6, using 0.3-0.4 meter aperture telescopes from the Coral Towers Observatory in Cairns, Australia. The light curves show well-defined phases, including very rapid brightening early on (0.5 mag in 6 hr observed during the night of Sep. 24), a transition to a much slower rise between Sep. 25 and Sep. 28, and a plateau/peak around Oct. 7. These changes are coincident with the reported spectroscopic changes that, most likely, mark the start of a strong interaction between the fast SN ejecta and a dense circumstellar medium formed during the earlier LBV eruptions. In the 16-day observing period SN 2009ip brightened by 3.7 mag from I = 17.4 mag on Sep. 23.6 (MI = -14.2) to I = 13.7 mag (MI = -17.9) on Oct. 9.6, radiating ~2x10^49 erg in the optical wavelength range. Currently, SN 2009ip is more luminous than most Type IIP SNe and comparable to other Type IIn SNe.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.