Paper detail

The right acute angles problem?

The Danzer--Grünbaum acute angles problem asks for the largest size of a set of points in ${\mathbb R}^d$ that determines only acute angles. Recently, the problem was essentially solved thanks to the results of the second author and of Gerencsér and Harangi: now, the lower and the upper bounds are $2^{d-1}+1$ and $2^d-1$, respectively. The lower-bound construction is surprisingly simple. In this note, we suggest the following variant of the problem, which is one way to "save" the problem. Put $F(α) = \lim_{d\to \infty} f(d,α)^{1/d}$, where $f(d,α)$ is the largest set of points in ${\mathbb R}^d$ with no angle greater than $α$. Then the question is to find $c:= \lim_{α\to π/2^-}F(α).$ Although one may expect that $c=2$ in view of the result of Gerencsér and Harangi, the best lower bound we could get is $c\ge \sqrt 2$. We also solve a related problem of Erdos and Füredi on the "stability" of the acute angles problem and refute another conjecture stated in the same paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.