Paper detail

The richness dependence of galaxy cluster correlations: Results from a redshift survey of rich APM clusters

We analyse the spatial clustering properties of a new catalogue of very rich galaxy clusters selected from the APM Galaxy Survey. These clusters are of comparable richness and space density to Abell Richness Class $\geq 1$ clusters, but selected using an objective algorithm from a catalogue demonstrably free of artificial inhomogeneities. Evaluation of the two-point correlation function $ξ_{cc}(r)$ for the full sample and for richer subsamples reveals that the correlation amplitude is consistent with that measured for lower richness APM clusters and X-ray selected clusters. We apply a maxmimum likelihood estimator to find the best fitting slope and amplitude of a power law fit to $ξ_{cc}(r)$, and to estimate the correlation length $r_{0}$ (the value of $r$ at which $ξ_{cc}(r)$ is equal to unity). For clusters with a mean space density of $1.6\times 10^{-6}\hmpccc$ (equivalent to the space density of Abell Richness $\geq 2$ clusters), we find $r_{0}=21.3^{+11.1}_{-9.3} \hmpc$ (95% confidence limits). This is consistent with the weak richness dependence of $ξ_{cc}(r)$ expected in Gaussian models of structure formation. In particular, the amplitude of $ξ_{cc}(r)$ at all richnesses matches that of $ξ_{cc}(r)$ for clusters selected in N-Body simulations of a low density Cold Dark Matter model.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.