Paper detail

The retraction relation for biracks

In {\it Set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang-Baxter equation} (Duke Math. J. {\bf 100} (1999), 169--209), Etingof, Schedler and Soloviev introduced, for each non-degenerate involutive set-theoretical solution $(X,σ,τ)$ of the Yang-Baxter equation, the equivalence relation $\sim$ defined on the set $X$ and they considered a new non-degenerate involutive induced \emph{retraction} solution defined on the quotient set $X^{\sim}$. It is well known that translating set-theoretical non-degenerate solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation into the universal algebra language we obtain an algebra called a \emph{birack}. In the paper we introduce the \emph{generalized retraction} relation $\approx$ on a birack, which is equal to $\sim$ in an involutive case. We present a complete algebraic proof that the relation $\approx$ is a congruence of the birack. Thus we show that the retraction of a set-theoretical non-degenerate solution is well defined not only in the involutive case but also in the case of all non-involutive solutions.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.