Paper detail

The Rest-frame Ultraviolet Light Profile Shapes of Ly-alpha-Emitting Galaxies at z=3.1

We present a rest-frame ultraviolet morphological analysis of 78 resolved, high S/N z ~ 3.1 Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs) in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South (ECDF-S). Using HST/ACS V -band images taken as part of the GEMS, GOODS, and HUDF surveys. For each LAE system identified via our ground-based narrow-band imaging, we have identified those LAE systems with multiple components. We measure the concentration index and present the results of our GALFIT fits for ellipticity, Sersic index, and sizes for each resolved component with S/N > 30 as well as for each LAE system with S/N > 30. The LAEs show a heterogeneous distribution of morphologies while the ma jority tend to be highly concentrated and compact in size. We only measure the morphological properties of resolved LAEs. For systems showing multiple components we also measured the morphology of the individual components. The resolved LAEs are highly concentrated (2 < C < 4) and show a similar distribution to that measured for stars, suggesting that this diagnostic is a poor discriminator near the resolution limit. The measured ellipticities for components show a distribution peaked at ε ~ 0.55 which is significantly different from the flat distribution of ellipticities observed for local spiral galaxies and is similar to the distribution found for Lyman-break galaxies at the same redshift. There is a wide range of best-fit Sersic indices (1 < n < 10) with the majority being between 0 < n < 2. The distribution is similar to the distribution of Sersic indices seen locally. A visual inspection of the images suggests a qualitative morphological transition at n ~ 2, with small-n LAEs having extended or multimodal light distributions and relatively little diffuse emission and large-n LAEs have compact central components surrounded by diffuse emission.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.