Paper detail

The Rest-Frame Optical Spectroscopic Properties of Ly$α$-Emitters at $z\sim2.5$: The Physical Origins of Strong Ly$α$ Emission

We present rest-frame optical spectra of 60 faint ($R_{AB}\sim 27$; $L\sim0.1 L_*$) Ly$α$-selected galaxies (LAEs) at $z\approx2.56$. The average LAE is consistent with the extreme low-metallicity end of the continuum-selected galaxy distribution at $z\approx2-3$. In particular, the LAEs have extremely high [OIII] $λ$5008/H$β$ ratios (log([OIII]/H$β$) $\sim$ 0.8) and low [NII] $λ$6585/H$α$ ratios (log([NII]/H$α$) $<-1.15$). Using the [OIII] $λ$4364 auroral line, we find that the star-forming regions in faint LAEs are characterized by high electron temperatures ($T_e\approx1.8\times10^4$K), low oxygen abundances (12 + log(O/H) $\approx$ 8.04, $Z_{neb}\approx0.22Z_\odot$), and high excitations with respect to more luminous galaxies. Our faintest LAEs have line ratios consistent with even lower metallicities, including six with 12 + log(O/H) $\approx$ 6.9$-$7.4 ($Z_{neb}\approx0.02-0.05Z_\odot$). We interpret these observations in light of new models of stellar evolution (including binary interactions). We find that strong, hard ionizing continua are required to reproduce our observed line ratios, suggesting that faint galaxies are efficient producers of ionizing photons and important analogs of reionization-era galaxies. Furthermore, we investigate physical trends accompanying Ly$α$ emission across the largest current sample of combined Ly$α$ and rest-optical galaxy spectroscopy, including 60 faint LAEs and 368 more luminous galaxies at similar redshifts. We find that Ly$α$ emission is strongly correlated with nebular excitation and ionization and weakly correlated with dust attenuation, suggesting that metallicity plays a strong role in determining the observed properties of these galaxies by modulating their stellar spectra, nebular excitation, and dust content.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.