Paper detail

The Renyi-Ulam pathological liar game with a fixed number of lies

The $q$-round Renyi-Ulam pathological liar game with $k$ lies on the set $[n]:=\{1,...,n\}$ is a 2-player perfect information zero sum game. In each round Paul chooses a subset $A\subseteq [n]$ and Carole either assigns 1 lie to each element of $A$ or to each element of $[n]\setminus A$. Paul wins if after $q$ rounds there is at least one element with $k$ or fewer lies. The game is dual to the original Renyi-Ulam liar game for which the winning condition is that at most one element has $k$ or fewer lies. We prove the existence of a winning strategy for Paul to the existence of a covering of the discrete hypercube with certain relaxed Hamming balls. Defining $F^*_k(q)$ to be the minimum $n$ such that Paul can win the $q$-round pathological liar game with $k$ lies and initial set $[n]$, we find $F^*_1(q)$ and $F^*_2(q)$ exactly. For fixed $k$ we prove that $F_k^*(q)$ is within an absolute constant (depending only on $k$) of the sphere bound, $2^q/\binom{q}{\leq k}$; this is already known to hold for the original Renyi-Ulam liar game due to a result of J. Spencer.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.