Paper detail

The remarkable accuracy of an $O(N^6)$ perturbative correction to opposite-spin CCSD: are triples necessary for chemical accuracy in coupled cluster?

The focus of this work is OS-CCSD-SPT(2), which is a second-order similarity transformed perturbation theory correction to opposite spin coupled cluster singles doubles, where in the latter the same-spin amplitudes are removed and the opposite-spin ones are solved self consistently. We demonstrate that, for non-multireference molecules, OS-CCSD-SPT(2) produces relative energies that rival the accuracy of higher-order methods like CCSD(T). For example, using PBE0 orbitals in the reference, OS-CCSD-SPT(2) exhibits a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 0.66 kcal/mol with respect to CCSD(2) benchmark values for the non-multireference subset of W4-08 atomization energies (c.f. a MAD > 6 kcal/mol for CCSD). OS-CCSD-SPT(2) is free of empirical parameters, has an instrinsic scaling of $O(N^6)$, and makes no use of triples. It is also naturally amenable to higher order corrections: the associated third-order correction, OS-CCSD-SPT(3), which does involve connected triples and quadruples, exhibits a MAD of 0.44 kcal/mol for the same benchmark.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.