Paper detail

The reliability of [CII] as a star formation rate indicator

The [CII] 157.74 μm line is an important coolant for the neutral interstellar gas. Since [CII] is the brightest spectral line for most galaxies, it is a potentially powerful tracer of star formation activity. In this paper we present a calibration of the star formation rate as a function of the [CII] luminosity for a sample of 24 star-forming galaxies in the nearby universe. This sample includes objects classified as HII regions or LINERs, but omits all Seyfert galaxies with a significant AGN contribution to the mid-infrared photometry. In order to calibrate the SFR against the line luminosity, we rely on both GALEX FUV data, which is an ideal tracer of the unobscured star formation, and MIPS 24 μm, to probe the dust-enshrouded fraction of star formation. In case of normal star-forming galaxies, the [CII] luminosity correlates well with the star formation rate. However, the extension of this relation to more quiescent (Halpha EW <= 10 A) or ultraluminous galaxies should be handled with caution, since these objects show a non-linearity in the L([CII])-to-L(FIR) ratio as a function of L(FIR) (and thus, their star formation activity). We provide two possible explanations for the origin of the tight correlation between the [CII] emission and the star formation activity on a global galaxy-scale. A first interpretation could be that the [CII] emission from PDRs arises from the immediate surroundings of star-forming regions. Since PDRs are neutral regions of warm dense gas at the boundaries between HII regions and molecular clouds and they provide the bulk of [CII] emission in most galaxies, we believe that a more or less constant contribution from these outer layers of photon-dominated molecular clumps to the [CII] emission provides a straightforward explanation for this close link between the [CII] luminosity and SFR. Alternatively,... (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.