Paper detail

The relevance of ram pressure stripping for the evolution of blue cluster galaxies as seen at optical wavelengths

Ram pressure stripping is one of the most efficient mechanisms able to affect the gas reservoir in cluster galaxies and in the last decades many studies have characterized the properties of stripped galaxies. A definite census of the importance of this process in local clusters is though still missing. Here we characterize the fraction of galaxies showing signs of stripping at optical wavelengths, using the data of 66 clusters from the WINGS and OMEGAWINGS surveys. We focus on the infalling galaxy population and hence only consider blue, bright (B<18.2) late-type spectroscopically confirmed cluster members within 2 virial radii. In addition to "traditional" stripping candidates (SC) -- i.e. galaxies showing unilateral debris and tails -- we also consider unwinding galaxies (UG) as potentially stripped galaxies. Recent work has indeed unveiled a connection between unwinding features and ram pressure stripping and even though only integral field studies can inform on how often these features are indeed due to ram pressure, it is important to include them in the global census. We performed a visual inspection of B-band images and here we release a catalog of 143 UG. SC and UG each represent ~15-20% of the inspected sample. If we make the assumption that they both are undergoing ram pressure stripping, we can conclude that at any given time in the low-z universe about 35% of the infalling cluster population show signs of stripping in their morphology at optical wavelengths. These fractions depend on color, mass, morphology, and little on clustercentric distance. Making some rough assumptions on the duration of the tail visibility and on the time cluster galaxies can maintain blue colors, we infer that almost all bright blue late-type cluster galaxies undergo a stripping phase during their life, boosting the importance of ram pressure stripping in cluster galaxy evolution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.