Paper detail

The relationship between [OIII]5007A equivalent width and obscuration in AGN

In this paper we study the relationship between the equivalent width (EW) of the [OIII]5007A narrow emission line in AGN and the level of obscuration. To this end, we combine the results of a systematic spectral analysis, both in the optical and in the X-rays, on a statistically complete sample of ~170 X-ray selected AGN from the XMM-Newton Bright Serendipitous Source sample (XBS). We find that the observed large range of [OIII]5007A equivalent widths observed in the sample (from a few A up to 500A) is well explained as a combination of an intrinsic spread, probably due to the large range of covering factors of the Narrow Line Region, and the effect of absorption. The intrinsic spread is dominant for EW below 40-50A while absorption brings the values of EW up to ~100-150A, for moderate levels of absorption (AV~0.5-2 mag) or up to ~500A for AV>2 mag. In this picture, the absorption has a significant impact on the observed EW also in type~1 AGN. Using numerical simulations we find that this model is able to reproduce the [OIII]5007A EW distribution observed in the XBS sample and correctly predicts the shape of the EW distribution observed in the optically selected sample of QSO taken from the SDSS survey.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.