Paper detail

The relationship between age, metallicity, and abundances for disk stars in a simulated Milky Way galaxy

Observations of the Milky Way's low-$α$ disk show that at fixed metallicity, [Fe/H], several element abundance, [X/Fe], correlate with age, with unique slopes and small scatters around the age-[X/Fe] relations. In this study, we turn to simulations to explore the age-[X/Fe] relations for the elements C, N, O, Mg, Si, S, and Ca that are traced in a FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulation of a Milky Way-like galaxy, m12i, and understand what physical conditions give rise to the observed age-[X/Fe] trends. We first explore the distributions of mono-age populations in their birth and current locations, [Fe/H], and [X/Fe], and find evidence for inside-out radial growth for stars with ages < 7 Gyr. We then examine the age-[X/Fe] relations across m12i's disk and find that the direction of the trends agree with observations, apart from C, O, and Ca, with remarkably small intrinsic scatters, $σ_{int}$ (0.01-0.04 dex). This $σ_{int}$ measured in the simulations is also metallicity-dependent, with $σ_{int}$ $\approx$ 0.025 dex at [Fe/H]=-0.25 dex versus $σ_{int}$ $\approx$ 0.015 dex at [Fe/H]=0 dex, and a similar metallicity dependence is seen in the GALAH survey for the elements in common. Additionally, we find that $σ_{int}$ is higher in the inner galaxy, where stars are older and formed in less chemically-homogeneous environments. The age-[X/Fe] relations and the small scatter around them indicate that simulations capture similar chemical enrichment variance as observed in the Milky Way, arising from stars sharing similar element abundances at a given birth place and time.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.