Paper detail

The reheating constraints to natural inflation in Horndeski gravity

For the subclass of Horndeski theory of gravity, we investigate the effects of reheating on the predictions of natural inflation. In the presence of derivative self-interaction of a scalar field and its kinetic coupling to the Einstein tensor, the gravitational friction to inflaton dynamics is enhanced. As a result, the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ is suppressed. We place the observational constraints on a natural inflation model and show that the model is now consistent with the observational data for some plausible range of the model parameter $Δ$, mainly due to the suppressed tensor-to-scalar ratio. To be consistent with the data at the $1σ$ ($68\%$ confidence) level, a slightly longer $N_k\gtrsim60$ duration of inflation than usually assumed is preferred. Since the duration of inflation, for any specific inflaton potential, is related to reheating parameters, including the duration $N_{re}$, temperature $T_{re}$, and equation-of-state $ω_{re}$ parameter during reheating, we imposed the effects of reheating to the inflationary predictions to put further constraints. The results show that the duration of inflation $N_k$ is affected by considerations of reheating, mainly by the $ω_{re}$ and $T_{re}$ parameters. If reheating occurs instantaneously for which $N_{re}=0$ and $ω_{re}=1/3$, the duration of inflation is estimated to be $N_k\simeq57$, where the exact value is less sensitive to the model parameter $Δ$ compatible with the CMB data. The duration of inflation is longer (or shorter) than $N_k\simeq57$ for the equation of state larger (or smaller) than 1/3 hence $N_{re}\neq0$. The maximum temperature at the end of reheating is $T_{re}^\text{max}\simeq3\times 10^{15}$ GeV, which corresponds to the instantaneous reheating. The low reheating temperature, as low as a few MeV, is also possible when $ω_{re}$ is closer to $1/3$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.