Paper detail

The regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme for history matching of petroleum reservoirs,

In this paper we study a history matching approach that consists of finding stable approximations to the problem of minimizing the weighted least-squares functional that penalizes the misfit between the reservoir model predictions $G(u)$ and noisy observations $y^η$. In other words, we are interested in computing $u^η\equiv \arg\min_{u\in X}\frac{1}{2}\vert\vert Γ^{-1/2}(y-G(u))\vert\vert_{Y}^{2} $ where $Γ$ is the measurements error covariance, $Y$ is the observation space and $X$ is a set of admissible parameters. This is an ill-posed nonlinear inverse problem that we address by means of the regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme developed in \cite{Hanke,Hanke2}. Under certain conditions on $G$, the theory of \cite{Hanke,Hanke2} ensures convergence of the scheme to stable approximations to the inverse problem. We propose an implementation of the regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme that enforces prior knowledge of the geologic properties. In particular, the prior mean $\overline{u}$ is incorporated in the initial guess of the algorithm and the prior error covariance $C$ is enforced through the definition of the parameter space $X$. Our main goal is to numerically show that the proposed implementation of the regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme of Hanke is a robust method capable of providing accurate estimates of the geologic properties for small noise measurements. The performance for recovering the true permeability with the regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme is compared against the more standard techniques for history matching proposed in \cite{Li,Tavakoli,svdRML,Oliver}. Our numerical experiments suggest that the history matching approach based on iterative regularization is robust and could potentially be used to improve further on various methodologies already proposed as effective tools for history matching in petroleum reservoirs

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.