Paper detail

The regular conducting fluid model for relativistic thermodynamics

The "regular" model presented here can be considered to be the most natural solution to the problem of constructing the simplest possible relativistic analogue of the category of classical Fourier--Euler thermally conducting fluid models as characterised by a pair of equations of state for just two dependent variables (an equilibrium density and a conducting scalar). The historically established but causally unsatisfactory solution to this problem due to Eckart is shown to be based on an ansatz that is interpretable as postulating a most unnatural relation between the (particle and entropy) velocities and their associated momenta, which accounts for the well known bad behaviour of that model which has recently been shown to have very pathological mixed-elliptic-hyperbolic comportments. The newer (and more elegant) solution of Landau and Lifshitz has a more mathematically respectable parabolic-hyperbolic comportment, but is still compatible with a well posed initial value problem only in such a restricted limit-case such as that of linearised perturbations of a static background. For mathematically acceptable behaviour undermore general circumstances, and a fortiori for the physically motivated requirement of subluminal signal propagation, only strictly hyperbolic behaviour is acceptable. Attention is drawn here to the availability of a more modern "regular" solution which, is fully satisfactory as far as all these requirements are concerned. This "regular" category of relativistic conducting fluid models arises naturally within a recently developed variational approach, in which the traditionally important stress--momentum-energy density tensor is relegated to a secondary role, while the relevant covariant 4-momentum co-vectors are instead brought to the fore.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.