Paper detail

The redshift evolution of oxygen and nitrogen abundances in emission-line SDSS galaxies

The oxygen and nitrogen abundance evolutions with redshift and galaxy stellar mass in emission-line SDSS galaxies are investigated. This is the first such study for nitrogen abundances, and it provides an additional constraint for the study of the chemical evolution of galaxies. We have devised a criterion to recognize and exclude from consideration AGNs and star-forming galaxies with large errors in the line flux measurements. To select star-forming galaxies with accurate line fluxes measurements, we require that, for each galaxy, the nitrogen abundances derived with various calibrations based on different emission lines agree. Using this selection criterion, subsamples of star-forming galaxies have been extracted from catalogs of the MPA/JHU group. We found that the galaxies of highest masses, those with masses > 10^11.2 M_sun, have not been enriched in both oxygen and nitrogen over the last 3 Gyr: they have formed their stars in the so distant past that these have returned their nucleosynthesis products to the interstellar medium before z=0.25. The galaxies in the mass range from 10^11.0 M_sun to 10^11.2 M_sun do not show an appreciable enrichment in oxygen, but do show some enrichment in nitrogen: they also formed their stars before z=0.25 but later in comparison to the galaxies of highest masses; these stars have not returned nitrogen to the interstellar medium before z=0.25 because they have not had enough time to evolve. This suggests that stars with lifetimes of 2-3 Gyr contribute to the nitrogen production. Finally, galaxies with masses < 10^11 M_sun show enrichment in both oxygen and nitrogen during the last 3 Gyr: they have undergone appreciable star formation and have converted up to 20% of their mass into stars over this period.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.