Paper detail

The red tail of carbon stars in the LMC: Models meet 2MASS and DENIS observations

Carbon stars are known to exhibit systematically redder near-infrared colours with respect to M-type stars. In the near-infrared colour-magnitude diagrams provided by the 2MASS and DENIS surveys, the LMC C-type stars draw a striking red tail, well separated from the sequences of O-rich giants. So far, this conspicuous feature has been absent from any set of available isochrones, even the few existing ones that include the TP-AGB evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars. To investigate such issue we simulate the complete 2MASS Ks vs.(J-Ks) data towards the LMC by means of a population synthesis approach, that relies on extended libraries of published stellar evolutionary tracks, including the TP-AGB phase. The simulations provide quite a detailed description of the several vertical fingers and inclined sequences seen in 2MASS data, due to both Galactic foreground and LMC O-rich stars. Instead, as mentioned, the red tail of C-stars sets a major difficulty: we find that TP-AGB models with solar-scaled molecular opacities, the usual assumption of existing AGB calculations, do not succeed in reproducing this feature. Our tests indicate that the main reason for this failure should not be ascribed to empirical Teff - (J-K) transformations for C-type stars. Instead, the discrepancy is simply removed by adopting new evolutionary models that account for the changes in molecular opacities as AGB stars get enriched in carbon via the third dredge-up (Marigo 2002). In fact, simulations that adopt these models are able to reproduce, for the first time, the red tail of C-stars in near-infrared CMDs. Finally, we point out that these simulations also provide useful indications about the efficiency of the third dredge-up process, and the pulsation modes of long-period variables.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.