The `Red Supergiant Problem': the upper luminosity boundary of type-II supernova progenitors

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

By comparing the properties of Red Supergiant (RSG) supernova progenitors to those of field RSGs, it has been claimed that there is an absence of progenitors with luminosities LL above log⁡(L/L⊙)>5.2\log(L/L_\odot) > 5.2. This is in tension with the empirical upper luminosity limit of RSGs at log⁡(L/L⊙)=5.5\log(L/L_\odot) = 5.5, a result known as the `Red Supergiant Problem'. This has been interpreted as evidence for an upper mass threshold for the formation of black-holes. In this paper, we compare the observed luminosities of RSG SN progenitors with the observed RSG LL-distribution in the Magellanic Clouds. Our results indicate that the absence of bright SN II-P/L progenitors in the current sample can be explained at least in part by the steepness of the LL-distribution and a small sample size, and that the statistical significance of the Red Supergiant Problem is between 1-2σσ . Secondly, we model the luminosity distribution of II-P/L progenitors as a simple power-law with an upper and lower cutoff, and find an upper luminosity limit of log⁡(Lhi/L⊙)=5.20−0.11+0.17\log(L_{\rm hi}/L_\odot) = 5.20^{+0.17}_{-0.11} (68\% confidence), though this increases to ∼\sim5.3 if one fixes the power-law slope to be that expected from theoretical arguments. Again, the results point to the significance of the RSG Problem being within ∼2σ\sim 2 σ. Under the assumption that all progenitors are the result of single-star evolution, this corresponds to an upper mass limit for the parent distribution of Mhi=19.2M⊙M_{\rm hi} = 19.2{\rm M_\odot}, ±1.3M⊙(systematic)\pm1.3 {\rm M_\odot (systematic)}, −2.3+4.5M⊙^{+4.5}_{-2.3} {\rm M_\odot} (random) (68\% confidence limits).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.