Paper detail

The red sequence of Abell X-ray underluminous clusters

We present an analysis of the colour-magnitude relation for a sample of 56 X-ray underluminous Abell clusters, aiming to unveil properties that may elucidate the evolutionary stages of the galaxy populations that compose such systems. To do so, we compared the parameters of their colour-magnitude relations with the ones found for another sample of 50 "normal" X-ray emitting Abell clusters, both selected in an objective way. The $g$ and $r$ magnitudes from the SDSS-DR7 were used for constructing the colour-magnitude relations. We found that both samples show the same trend: the red sequence slopes change with redshift, but the slopes for X-ray underluminous clusters are always flatter than those for the normal clusters, by a difference of about 69% along the surveyed redshift range of 0.05 $\le z <$ 0.20. Also, the intrinsic scatter of the colour-magnitude relation was found to grow with redshift for both samples but, for the X-ray underluminous clusters, this is systematically larger by about 28%. By applying the Cramér test to the result of this comparison between X-ray normal and underluminous cluster samples, we get probabilities of 92% and 99% that the red sequence slope and intrinsic scatter distributions, respectively, differ, in the sense that X-ray underluminous clusters red sequences show flatter slopes and higher scatters in their relations. No significant differences in the distributions of red-sequence median colours are found between the two cluster samples. This points to X-ray underluminous clusters being younger systems than normal clusters, possibly in the process of accreting groups of galaxies, individual galaxies and gas.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.