Paper detail

The reanalysis of spectra of GRB 080913 to estimate the neutral fraction of the IGM at a redshift of 6.7

Aims: We reanalyse optical spectra of the z=6.7 gamma-ray burst GRB 080913, adding hitherto unpublished spectra, in order to reassess the measurement of the neutral fraction of the IGM at high redshifts. Methods: In the data reduction we take particular care to minimise systematic errors in the sky subtraction, which are evident in the published spectrum, and compromise the analysis. The final combined spectrum has a higher S/N than the previously published spectrum by a factor of 1.3. Results: We find a single significant absorption line redward of the Ly-alpha continuum break, which we identify with the SII+SiII blend (rest wavelength of 0.1260 micron), at z=6.733. The sharp spectral break at Ly-alpha implies a comparatively low total column density of neutral hydrogen along the line of sight, log [N(HI)/cm^-2] < 20. We model the absorption with a host-galaxy DLA, surrounded by an ionised region of unknown size r, within the IGM of neutral fraction, x(HI). Despite knowing the source redshift, and the improved S/N of the spectrum, when fitting only over wavelengths redward of Ly-alpha, no useful constraints on x(HI) can be obtained. We consider the possibility of including the ionised region, blueward of Ly-alpha, in constraining the fit. For the optimistic assumption that the ionised region is transparent, tau_{GP} << 1, we find that the region is of small size r < 2 proper Mpc, and we obtain an upper limit to the neutral fraction of the IGM at z=6.7 of x(HI) < 0.73.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.