Paper detail

The real and apparent convergence of N-body simulations of the dark matter structures: is the Navarro-Frenk-White profile real?

We consider the reasons why a cuspy NFW-like profile persistently occurs in N-body simulations, in contradiction to some astronomical observations. The routine method of testing the convergence of N-body simulations (in particular, the negligibility of two-body scattering effect) is to find the conditions under which the shape of the formed structures is insensitive to numerical parameters. The results obtained with this approach suggest a surprisingly minor role of the particle collisions: the central density profile remains untouched and close to NFW, even if the simulation time significantly exceeds the collisional relaxation time $τ_r$. We analyze the test body distribution in the halo center with help of the Fokker-Planck equation. It turns out that the Fokker-Planck diffusion transforms any reasonable initial distribution into NFW-like profile $ρ\propto r^{-1}$ in a time shorter than $τ_r$. On the contrary, profile $ρ\propto r^{-1}$ should survive much longer, being a sort of attractor: the Fokker-Planck diffusion is self-compensated in this case. Thus the test body scattering may create a stable NFW-like pseudosolution that can be mixed up with the real convergence. This fact might help to eliminate the well-known 'cusp vs. core' problem.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.